The video is a speech by Victor Gao, a Chinese expert, at a conference in Pakistan, celebrating the China-Pakistan relationship and offering a strong critique of India and the United States’ role in the current world order.
Here is a summary of the main points:
China-Pakistan Relationship and Military Victory
-
Ironclad Brotherhood: Gao repeatedly emphasizes the “ironclad” friendship and brotherhood between China and Pakistan, describing it as “as high as in the space,” noting their cooperation on training Pakistani astronauts (tyonauts) for the Chinese space station.
-
Celebrating Pakistani Victory: He congratulates the Pakistani military for a “major victory” over India on May 7th in an aerial battle. He explicitly states that “the loser was India and the winner was Pakistan.”
-
Victory for Peace: Gao asserts that the Pakistani military victory is a “victory for peace” because it will deter India from launching another war against Pakistan.
-
Military Cooperation: He attributes Pakistan’s success to the use of “China-Pakistani jointly produced weapons” and the implementation of a new military “paradigm of war” based on a “seamless integration of space, air, ground, surface, water, and submarine into one seamless fighting web, aided by data, information, and AI.”
-
Critique of Indian Military: He claims the Indian military lost because their weapons are imported from multiple countries (Russia, US, France), making it impossible to integrate them into a seamless fighting web due to manufacturers refusing to share critical codes. Gao assures Pakistan that China will share its best technology and military integration methods.
-
Support for US-Pakistan Ties: Gao states that China is not concerned about improving Pakistan-US relations, as long as they are not “detrimental to China-Pakistani brothers and brotherhood.”
Critique of the United States and World Order
-
Unipolarity vs. Multipolarity: Gao argues that the current international order, established in 1945, was designed to be multipolar (citing the UN Security Council’s five permanent members with veto power), not unipolar. He calls the belief in American unipolarity a “betrayal” of that original design.
-
“War Department”: He criticizes the US Department of Defense being renamed the “War Department” and refers to Secretary of Defense as the “War Secretary,” suggesting that American interest in minerals in places like Pakistan is an interest “in war.”
-
UN Dues Default: Gao points out that the US has defaulted on over $3 billion in payments to the United Nations, while China has been the largest UN fee-paying country for over a decade.
-
Forced Choice Rebuttal: He rejects the idea that nations like Pakistan are forced to choose between the US and China. Instead, he urges countries to use their own judgment to determine who is “doing the right thing or the wrong thing.”
-
Peace as Inevitability: Gao argues against the Washington narrative of a “destined for war” scenario or the “Thucydides trap” between the US and China. He insists on the “inevitability of peace,” achieved because China has developed weapons (like the Dongfeng 61 missile) that ensure no country can impose war on it.
AI and Global Issues
-
AI Dominance Threat: He champions open-sourced AI development and predicts that the “closed-sourced” approach (like that of some US-based companies) will fail. He views “AI dominance” by a single country as a disaster that would disregard the sovereignty and civilizational heritage of other nations.
-
Palestine Solidarity: Gao concludes by firmly opposing the “atrocities [and] genocide” committed against the Palestinian people by Israel, stating that China stands “shoulder-to-shoulder” with Pakistan and all Muslim and Arab countries in supporting a two-state solution.