Victor Gao: China Never Saw UK as Enemy, UK Should Not Provoke Stronger China!

Here is the outline of the video, titled “Victor Gao: China Never Saw UK as Enemy, UK Should Not Provoke Stronger China!”:

I. China’s View of the UK and Geopolitical Focus

  • No Enemy Status: From China’s perspective, the UK is not viewed as an enemy, a competitor, or a top priority.

  • Engagement for Mutual Benefit: China views the UK as an important country for engagement and mutual benefit, such as in tourism, education, and normal trade.

  • Primary Focus: The US: China’s primary geopolitical focus is the United States, which China views as a pacing threat and a country concerned about China catching up.

  • UK’s Relative Position: The speaker asserts that China is “way ahead of Britain” in almost all categories and that the UK is “not on China’s radar.”

II. Responding to UK Espionage and Hysteria

  • Hysteria in Britain: The speaker expresses concern over what he perceives as “a lot of hysteria in Britain about China” following reports of alleged spies.

  • Rule of Law: He stresses that Britain should adhere to the tradition of rule of law, maintain the presumption of innocence until conviction, and allow for due process.

  • Lack of Motivation: The speaker dismisses the notion of an active Chinese spying operation against the UK, stating there is no need for China to look at Britain as an adversary since they are not neighboring countries.

III. The New Chinese Embassy in London

  • Need for a Bigger Site: China requires a larger embassy in London because its current location is over a century old, very small, and not befitting the size of China as the world’s largest economy by purchasing power parity.

  • Reciprocity: The speaker supports both China’s need for a bigger embassy in London and Britain’s need for a new, expanded embassy in Beijing, emphasizing that this should be handled on a reciprocal basis.

  • Dismissing Security Concerns: The claim by some British politicians that China wants the location to tap into communication cables is called “complete nonsense.” The speaker suggests the location became available because the British government wanted to monetize old, unused property.

IV. Consequences of Denying the Embassy Site

  • A “Stupid Decision”: Denying the new embassy site would be a “stupid decision” by the British government.

  • Reciprocal Retaliation: If the UK government denies China access to the London site, China will reciprocally deny the UK access to its preferred new embassy site in Beijing.

  • Dignified Counterparty: The speaker advocates for China and Britain to treat each other on an equal and dignified basis, despite historical issues.

  • Serious Consequences: If the UK “wants to ruffle feather” with China—the biggest economy and a powerful military force—it must be fully aware of the consequences, which could include making a potential visit by Prime Minister Keir Starmer unadvisable.

V. China as a Defender of Peace and Free Trade

  • Rebuttal to “Malicious Dictatorship”: The speaker strongly refutes a listener’s description of China as a “malicious dictatorship” aiming to spread communist rule worldwide.

  • Champion of Free Trade and Peace: He asserts that China is the major force defending free trade for all mankind, including for the British and American people.

  • Military Development for Peace: China is building its military capabilities as a measure against the United States to ensure the American government is more peaceful and less “jingoistic,” arguing that war between the two should never be an option. China is presented as a “staunch defender of peace.”