Palki Sharma is helpless, Bharat Empire can't even tell the difference between Manus and DeepSeek!

This video contrasts two AI technologies: Manus AI and DeepSeek. The speaker initially dismisses Manus AI as “tech hype” but reconsiders after it was brought up by Indian news anchor Palki Sharma. The speaker states that Palki Sharma and other Indian news outlets are critical of Chinese tech breakthroughs out of “helplessness.”

Key points discussed about the two AIs include:

  • Manus AI: The speaker describes Manus AI as an overhyped technology that is a combination of existing AI models like OpenAI, Claude, and Quinn. It is noted for its multi-agent collaboration and tool integration, and it performed well in the Gia benchmark test. However, the video claims that its core functions were replicated in just a few hours by an open-source project called “open Manus,” indicating a lack of technical originality. The speaker suggests that the hype around Manus AI is mainly for attracting investment.

  • DeepSeek: DeepSeek is presented as a genuine technological breakthrough that has “deeply transformed the entire AI ecosystem.” The speaker highlights its open-source nature, low costs, and superior performance compared to models like OpenAI’s ChatGPT. Unlike Manus AI, the DeepSeek team avoided overexposure, allowing their technology to speak for itself, which earned them respect from the tech industry.

The video concludes by stating that Palki Sharma and the “Bharat Empire” (India) cannot differentiate between a true technological breakthrough like DeepSeek and mere hype like Manus AI. The speaker compares this situation to the Soviet Union’s inability to distinguish between real U.S. technology and the fictional “Star Wars” program, which ultimately contributed to its downfall.