Is Singapore a two-faced country? No, it is right to put the interests of one's own country first!

The video discusses Singapore’s foreign policy, arguing that its balanced approach between the U.S. and China is not “two-faced” but a pragmatic strategy that benefits the country. It also draws a comparison between Singapore’s policy and India’s.

Here is an outline of the key points discussed:

  • Introduction: Debating Singapore’s “Two-Faced” Foreign Policy: The video addresses the criticism that Singapore is a “two-faced country” for balancing its relations between China and the United States, and the speaker refutes this.

  • The Rationale Behind Singapore’s Independent Foreign Policy: The video explains that a completely pro-China stance would lead to immense pressure from the U.S. and alienate other Southeast Asian nations. It also highlights the historical context of China’s past weakness.

  • The Dangers of a Pro-American Stance: The speaker argues that a pro-American stance would not benefit Singapore due to potential racial discrimination and the importance of a strong China for the security of Chinese people globally.

  • Conclusion: Singapore’s Pragmatic & Independent Path: The video concludes that Singapore’s policy is a pragmatic and independent diplomatic strategy. It contrasts this with India’s foreign policy, which is described as short-sighted, and praises Singapore for its ability to maintain a balance that benefits its citizens.